1. Reposi�rio Institucional do Incaper
  2. Biblioteca Rui Tendinha
  3. Memória Técnica do Incaper
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://biblioteca.incaper.es.gov.br/digital/handle/123456789/3693
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRODRIGUES, S. P.
dc.contributor.authorVENTURA, J. A.
dc.contributor.authorZINGALE, R. B.
dc.contributor.authorFERNANDES, P. M. B.
dc.contributor.otherSilas Pessini Rodrigues, UFRJ; Jose Aires Ventura, Incaper; UFES; UFES.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T17:58:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T17:58:22Z-
dc.date.created2009
dc.date.issued2019-08-12
dc.identifier.other22734
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca.incaper.es.gov.br/digital/handle/123456789/3693-
dc.descriptionIntroduction A variety of sample preparation protocols for plant proteomic analysis using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DE) have been reported. However, they usually have to be adapted and further optimised for the analysis of plant species not previously studied. Objective This work aimed to evaluate different sample preparation protocols for analysing Carica papaya L. leaf proteins through 2‐DE. Methodology Four sample preparation methods were tested: (1) phenol extraction and methanol ammonium acetate precipitation; (2) no precipitation fractionation; and the traditional trichloroacetic acid acetone precipitation either (3) with or (4) without protein fractionation. The samples were analysed for their compatibility with SDS PAGE (1‐DE) and 2‐DE. Fifteen selected protein spots were trypsinised and analysed by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation time‐of‐flight tandem mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS/MS), followed by a protein search using the NCBInr database to accurately identify all proteins. Results Methods number 3 and 4 resulted in large quantities of protein with good 1‐DE separation and were chosen for 2‐DE analysis. However, only the TCA method without fractionation (no. 4) proved to be useful. Spot number and resolution advances were achieved, which included having an additional solubilisation step in the conventional TCA method. Moreover, most of the theoretical and experimental protein molecular weight and pI data had similar values, suggesting good focusing and, most importantly, limited protein degradation. Conclusion The described sample preparation method allows the proteomic analysis of papaya leaves by 2‐DE and mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF‐MS/MS). The methods presented can be a starting point for the optimisation of sample preparation protocols for other plant species. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.languagept_BR
dc.publisherPhytochemical analysis, v. 20, n. 6, p. 456-464, 2009.
dc.subjectMamão
dc.titleEvaluation of sample preparation methods for the analysis of papaya leaf proteins through two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
dc.type--
dc.ainfo.id21550
dc.ainfo.lastupdate2019-08-12
dc.ainfo.depositanteMerielem Frasson
dc.subject.nalthesaurusCarica papaya
dc.subject.nalthesaurusPlant proteomics
dc.subject.nalthesaurusProtein extraction method
dc.subject.nalthesaurusMass spectrometry
Aparece nas coleções:Memória Técnica do Incaper

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
evaluation-papaya-ventura.pdf325,44 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.