| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/01/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/09/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CULIK, M. P.; MARTINS, D. dos S.; ZANÚNCIO JUNIOR, J. S.; FORNAZIER, M. J.; VENTURA, J. A.; PERONTI, A. L. B. G.; ZANUNCIO, J.C. |
|
Afiliação: |
Mark Paul Culik, CNPQ; David dos Santos Martins, Incaper; José Salazar Zanuncio Junior, Incaper; Mauricio José Fornazier, Incaper; Jose Aires Ventura, Incaper; Ana Lúcia B .G. Peronti, UFV; José Cola Zanuncio, UFSCar. |
|
Título: |
The invasive hibiscus mealybug maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and its recent range expansion in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Florida Entomologist, 96(2):638-640. 2013. |
|
Páginas: |
4p. |
|
ISSN: |
1938-5102 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0234 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Até recentemente na América do Sul, a cochonilha Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green, 1908) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) estava restrita à região do Caribe, mas em 2010 foi detectada pela primeira vez no Brasil, em Roraima, e agora em 2012 foi encontrada no estado do Espírito Santo, localizado aproximadamente 3400 km a sudeste de Roraima. Maconellicoccus hirsutus, uma praga potencial de plantas economicamente importantes, pode tornar-se amplamente estabelecida na América do Sul e o uso de armadilhas de feromônio pode ser útil para detectar a entrada em novas áreas e para monitorar essa cochonilha. Embora M. hirsutus tenha sido registrada em um grande número de espécies de plantas, aparentemente poucas são hospedeiras preferidas e na maioria das áreas onde o inseto foi estabelecido, inimigos naturais mantém as populações dessa cochonilha abaixo dos níveis prejudiciais. Isto indica que, além de prevenção da disseminação da cochonilha, esforços devem ser direcionados para evitar o estabelecimento dessa praga invasora e para o aumento a preservação de seus inimigos naturais em áreas invadidas. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biodiversidade; Controle biológico; Distribuição geográfica; Espécies invasoras; Inimigos naturais; Neotropical. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biodiversity; Biological control; Geographic distribution; Invasive species; Natural enemies; Neotropical. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
http://biblioteca.incaper.es.gov.br/digital/bitstream/item/117/1/The-invasive-hibiscus-mealybug-and-its-recent-expansion-in-Brazil-Culik-et-al-2013.pdf
http://biblioteca.incaper.es.gov.br/digital/bitstream/item/164/1/82332-97042-1-PB.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02258naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1001373
005 2015-09-01
008 2013 bl --- 0-- u #d
022 $a1938-5102
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0234$2DOI
100 1 $aCULIK, M. P.
245 $aThe invasive hibiscus mealybug maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera$bPseudococcidae) and its recent range expansion in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
300 $a4p.
520 $aAté recentemente na América do Sul, a cochonilha Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green, 1908) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) estava restrita à região do Caribe, mas em 2010 foi detectada pela primeira vez no Brasil, em Roraima, e agora em 2012 foi encontrada no estado do Espírito Santo, localizado aproximadamente 3400 km a sudeste de Roraima. Maconellicoccus hirsutus, uma praga potencial de plantas economicamente importantes, pode tornar-se amplamente estabelecida na América do Sul e o uso de armadilhas de feromônio pode ser útil para detectar a entrada em novas áreas e para monitorar essa cochonilha. Embora M. hirsutus tenha sido registrada em um grande número de espécies de plantas, aparentemente poucas são hospedeiras preferidas e na maioria das áreas onde o inseto foi estabelecido, inimigos naturais mantém as populações dessa cochonilha abaixo dos níveis prejudiciais. Isto indica que, além de prevenção da disseminação da cochonilha, esforços devem ser direcionados para evitar o estabelecimento dessa praga invasora e para o aumento a preservação de seus inimigos naturais em áreas invadidas.
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aBiological control
650 $aGeographic distribution
650 $aInvasive species
650 $aNatural enemies
650 $aNeotropical
653 $aBiodiversidade
653 $aControle biológico
653 $aDistribuição geográfica
653 $aEspécies invasoras
653 $aInimigos naturais
653 $aNeotropical
700 1 $aMARTINS, D. dos S.
700 1 $aZANÚNCIO JUNIOR, J. S.
700 1 $aFORNAZIER, M. J.
700 1 $aVENTURA, J. A.
700 1 $aPERONTI, A. L. B. G.
700 1 $aZANUNCIO, J.C.
773 $tFlorida Entomologist, 96(2):638-640. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha (BRT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@incaper.es.gov.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/03/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/04/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MARTINS, D. dos S.; FORNAZIER, M. J.; VENTURA, J. A.; PIROVANI, V. D.; URAMOTO, K.; GUARÇONI, R. G.; CULIK, M. P.; FERREIRA, P. S. F.; ZANUNCIO, J. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
David dos Santos Martins, Incaper; Mauricio José Fornazier, Incaper; Jose Aires Ventura, Incaper; Victor Dias Pirovani, IFES Alegre; Keiko Uramoto, ESALQ; Rogerio Carvalho Guarçoni, Incaper; Mark Paul Culik, CNPq/Incaper; Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira, UFV; José Cola Zanuncio, UFV. |
|
Título: |
Coffea arabica and C. canephora as host plants for fruit flies (Tephritidae) and implications for commercial fruit crop pest management. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Protection, v. 156, 2022. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Because of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely
grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits of both coffee species. The quantity of C. capitata reared from C. arabica fruits (55.2 adults kg 1) was 15.3 times higher than the quantity reared from C. canephora fruits. Coffea arabica was also a much better host for A. fraterculus than C. canephora based on the number of adults reared from fruits. Results of this study indicate that C. arabica is a potential reservoir host of fruit flies, and therefore may play a significant role in fruit fly pest survival when preferred host fruits are lacking in winter months. This is the first study that compares
the two major cultivated coffee species as potential hosts and sources of fruit flies, and indicates that integrated pest management (IPM) should be utilized to inhibit dispersal of fruit flies from C. arabica to nearby areas where commercial fruit crops are grown. MenosBecause of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely
grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Café conilon. |
|
Thesagro: |
Café; Café Robusta; Ceratitis Capitata; Coffea Arábica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03147naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1023801
005 2022-04-01
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMARTINS, D. dos S.
245 $aCoffea arabica and C. canephora as host plants for fruit flies (Tephritidae) and implications for commercial fruit crop pest management.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aBecause of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits of both coffee species. The quantity of C. capitata reared from C. arabica fruits (55.2 adults kg 1) was 15.3 times higher than the quantity reared from C. canephora fruits. Coffea arabica was also a much better host for A. fraterculus than C. canephora based on the number of adults reared from fruits. Results of this study indicate that C. arabica is a potential reservoir host of fruit flies, and therefore may play a significant role in fruit fly pest survival when preferred host fruits are lacking in winter months. This is the first study that compares the two major cultivated coffee species as potential hosts and sources of fruit flies, and indicates that integrated pest management (IPM) should be utilized to inhibit dispersal of fruit flies from C. arabica to nearby areas where commercial fruit crops are grown.
650 $aCafé
650 $aCafé Robusta
650 $aCeratitis Capitata
650 $aCoffea Arábica
653 $aCafé conilon
700 1 $aFORNAZIER, M. J.
700 1 $aVENTURA, J. A.
700 1 $aPIROVANI, V. D.
700 1 $aURAMOTO, K.
700 1 $aGUARÇONI, R. G.
700 1 $aCULIK, M. P.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, P. S. F.
700 1 $aZANUNCIO, J. C.
773 $tCrop Protection$gv. 156, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha (BRT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
