| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@incaper.es.gov.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/06/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/10/2015 |
|
Autoria: |
GASPAROTTO, L.; FERREIRA, F. A.; LIMA, M. I. P. M.; PEREIRA, J. C. R.; SANTOS, A. F. dos |
|
Afiliação: |
Luadir Gasparotto; Francisco Alves Ferreira; Maria Imaculada P. M. Lima; José Clério Resende Pereira; Álvaro Ferreira dos Santos. |
|
Título: |
Enfermidades da seringueira no Brasil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1990 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Manaus, AM : EMBRAPA-CPAA, 1990. |
|
Páginas: |
35 p. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-CPAA. Circular Técnica, 3). |
|
ISSN: |
0103-6890 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Introdução; Doenças das folhas; Mal das folhas: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Plantio de clones resistentes; Enxertia de copa; Área de escape; Químico; Requeima e queda anormal das folhas: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Mancha areolada: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Antracnose: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Crosta negra; Mancha de Corynespora; Mancha concêntrica; Oidio; Mancha de alga; Queima do fio; Mancha de alternaria; Doenças do caule: Cancro estriado e cancro do tronco; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Mofo cinzento: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Rubelose; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; "Brown bast" ou secamento do painel; Sintomas; Controle; Morte descendente, cancro do enxerto e podridão da casca; Sintomas; Controle; Preventivo; Curativo; Escaldadura do caule; Ferimentos mecânicos no caule; Tumores; Doenças de raízes; Podridão de raízes; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Aplicação de fungicidas; Controle das principais doenças da seringueira; Referências bibliográficas. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Alga; Alternaria; Amazonas; Anthracnosis; Antracnose; Brasil; Cancro; Catacauma huberi; Caule; Cephaleuros mycoidea; Ceratocystis frimbriata; Controle; Controle químico; Corticium salmonicolor; Corynespora cassiicola; Crosta negra; Diagnóstico; Doença; Epidemiologia; Espécie; Etiologia; Folha; Fungi; Fungicida; Fungicides; Fungo; Hevea; Koleroga noxius; Lasiodiplodia theobromae; Leaves; Mal da folha; Mancha Concentrica; Mancha de alga; Mancha de corynespora; Microcyclus ulei; Mofo cinzento; Oidio; Oidium heveae; Painel; Pellicularia koleroga; Periconia manihoticola; Podridão da casca; Podridão da raiz; Queima do fio; Raiz; Requeima; Rubelose; Seringa; Seringueira; Sintoma. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03088nam a2200793 a 4500
001 1003371
005 2015-10-27
008 1990 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
022 $a0103-6890
100 1 $aGASPAROTTO, L.
245 $aEnfermidades da seringueira no Brasil.
260 $aManaus, AM : EMBRAPA-CPAA$c1990
300 $a35 p.$cil.
490 $a(EMBRAPA-CPAA. Circular Técnica, 3).
520 $aIntrodução; Doenças das folhas; Mal das folhas: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Plantio de clones resistentes; Enxertia de copa; Área de escape; Químico; Requeima e queda anormal das folhas: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Mancha areolada: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Antracnose: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Crosta negra; Mancha de Corynespora; Mancha concêntrica; Oidio; Mancha de alga; Queima do fio; Mancha de alternaria; Doenças do caule: Cancro estriado e cancro do tronco; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Mofo cinzento: Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Rubelose; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; "Brown bast" ou secamento do painel; Sintomas; Controle; Morte descendente, cancro do enxerto e podridão da casca; Sintomas; Controle; Preventivo; Curativo; Escaldadura do caule; Ferimentos mecânicos no caule; Tumores; Doenças de raízes; Podridão de raízes; Etiologia e epidemiologia; Sintomas; Controle; Aplicação de fungicidas; Controle das principais doenças da seringueira; Referências bibliográficas.
653 $aAlga
653 $aAlternaria
653 $aAmazonas
653 $aAnthracnosis
653 $aAntracnose
653 $aBrasil
653 $aCancro
653 $aCatacauma huberi
653 $aCaule
653 $aCephaleuros mycoidea
653 $aCeratocystis frimbriata
653 $aControle
653 $aControle químico
653 $aCorticium salmonicolor
653 $aCorynespora cassiicola
653 $aCrosta negra
653 $aDiagnóstico
653 $aDoença
653 $aEpidemiologia
653 $aEspécie
653 $aEtiologia
653 $aFolha
653 $aFungi
653 $aFungicida
653 $aFungicides
653 $aFungo
653 $aHevea
653 $aKoleroga noxius
653 $aLasiodiplodia theobromae
653 $aLeaves
653 $aMal da folha
653 $aMancha Concentrica
653 $aMancha de alga
653 $aMancha de corynespora
653 $aMicrocyclus ulei
653 $aMofo cinzento
653 $aOidio
653 $aOidium heveae
653 $aPainel
653 $aPellicularia koleroga
653 $aPericonia manihoticola
653 $aPodridão da casca
653 $aPodridão da raiz
653 $aQueima do fio
653 $aRaiz
653 $aRequeima
653 $aRubelose
653 $aSeringa
653 $aSeringueira
653 $aSintoma
700 1 $aFERREIRA, F. A.
700 1 $aLIMA, M. I. P. M.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. C. R.
700 1 $aSANTOS, A. F. dos
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha (BRT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@incaper.es.gov.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/03/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/04/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MARTINS, D. dos S.; FORNAZIER, M. J.; VENTURA, J. A.; PIROVANI, V. D.; URAMOTO, K.; GUARÇONI, R. G.; CULIK, M. P.; FERREIRA, P. S. F.; ZANUNCIO, J. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
David dos Santos Martins, Incaper; Mauricio José Fornazier, Incaper; Jose Aires Ventura, Incaper; Victor Dias Pirovani, IFES Alegre; Keiko Uramoto, ESALQ; Rogerio Carvalho Guarçoni, Incaper; Mark Paul Culik, CNPq/Incaper; Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira, UFV; José Cola Zanuncio, UFV. |
|
Título: |
Coffea arabica and C. canephora as host plants for fruit flies (Tephritidae) and implications for commercial fruit crop pest management. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Protection, v. 156, 2022. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Because of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely
grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits of both coffee species. The quantity of C. capitata reared from C. arabica fruits (55.2 adults kg 1) was 15.3 times higher than the quantity reared from C. canephora fruits. Coffea arabica was also a much better host for A. fraterculus than C. canephora based on the number of adults reared from fruits. Results of this study indicate that C. arabica is a potential reservoir host of fruit flies, and therefore may play a significant role in fruit fly pest survival when preferred host fruits are lacking in winter months. This is the first study that compares
the two major cultivated coffee species as potential hosts and sources of fruit flies, and indicates that integrated pest management (IPM) should be utilized to inhibit dispersal of fruit flies from C. arabica to nearby areas where commercial fruit crops are grown. MenosBecause of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely
grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Café conilon. |
|
Thesagro: |
Café; Café Robusta; Ceratitis Capitata; Coffea Arábica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03147naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1023801
005 2022-04-01
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMARTINS, D. dos S.
245 $aCoffea arabica and C. canephora as host plants for fruit flies (Tephritidae) and implications for commercial fruit crop pest management.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aBecause of the economic importance of fruit flies throughout the world, increased knowledge of alternative hosts of these pests is essential for integrated pest management in economically valuable fruit crops grown in regions where other host plant species such as coffee are also commonly cultivated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the cultivated coffee species Coffea arabica L. and Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner as hosts of fruit fly species in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, where both coffee species are widely grown in close proximity to a variety of economically valuable, and fruit fly susceptible, commercial fruit crops. Mature fruits of both coffee species were collected from 681 farms in 54 municipalities of Espírito Santo to identify the fruit fly species infesting coffee fruits and determine fruit fly infestation levels. Field and laboratory experiments were also conducted to study the relationships between coffee species and fruit fly infestation and development. Field infestation of coffee fruits by fruit flies was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora (?Conilon?). A total of 136.7 fruit fly pupae per kg of C. arabica fruits were found, in comparison to 5.4 pupae per kg of C. canephora fruits, and 97.1% of the adult fruit flies reared from coffee fruits emerged from C. arabicafruits. Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) were the most common fruit fly species associated with fruits of both coffee species. The quantity of C. capitata reared from C. arabica fruits (55.2 adults kg 1) was 15.3 times higher than the quantity reared from C. canephora fruits. Coffea arabica was also a much better host for A. fraterculus than C. canephora based on the number of adults reared from fruits. Results of this study indicate that C. arabica is a potential reservoir host of fruit flies, and therefore may play a significant role in fruit fly pest survival when preferred host fruits are lacking in winter months. This is the first study that compares the two major cultivated coffee species as potential hosts and sources of fruit flies, and indicates that integrated pest management (IPM) should be utilized to inhibit dispersal of fruit flies from C. arabica to nearby areas where commercial fruit crops are grown.
650 $aCafé
650 $aCafé Robusta
650 $aCeratitis Capitata
650 $aCoffea Arábica
653 $aCafé conilon
700 1 $aFORNAZIER, M. J.
700 1 $aVENTURA, J. A.
700 1 $aPIROVANI, V. D.
700 1 $aURAMOTO, K.
700 1 $aGUARÇONI, R. G.
700 1 $aCULIK, M. P.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, P. S. F.
700 1 $aZANUNCIO, J. C.
773 $tCrop Protection$gv. 156, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha (BRT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
