| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/09/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
GOMES, I. N.; GONTIJO, L. M.; LIMA, M. A. P.; ZANÚNCIO JUNIOR, J. S.; RESENDE, H. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
Ingrid N. Gomes; Lessando Moreira Gontijo; Maria Augusta Pereira Lima; José Salazar Zanuncio Junior, Incaper; Helder Canto Resende. |
|
Título: |
The survival and flight capacity of commercial honeybees and endangered stingless bees are impaired by common agrochemicals. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecotoxicology, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s10646-023-02699-8 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The impact of agrochemicals on native Brazilian bees may be underestimated, since studies of non-target effects on bees have, by and large, concerned mostly the Apis mellifera L. Furthermore, bees may be exposed in the field to multiple agrochemicals through different routes, thus suggesting the necessity for more comprehensive toxicological experiments. Here, we assessed the lethal and sublethal toxicity of multiple agrochemicals (herbicide [glyphosate ? Roundup®], fungicide [mancozeb], insecticide [thiamethoxam]) through distinct routes of exposure (contact or ingestion) to an endangered native Brazilian bee Melipona (Michmelia) capixaba Moure & Camargo, 1994 and to A. mellifera. Results indicate that none of the agrochemicals caused feeding repellency on the bees. Thiamethoxam caused high mortality of both species, regardless of the route of exposure or the dose used. In addition, thiametoxam altered the flight capacity of M. capixaba when exposed to the lowest dose via contact exposure. The field dose of glyphosate caused high mortality of both bee species after oral exposure as well as impaired the flight capacity of A. mellifera (ingestion exposure) and M. capixaba (contact exposure). The lower dose of glyphosate also impaired the flight of M. capixaba through either routes of exposure. Exposure of A. mellifera through contact and ingestion to both doses of mancozeb caused high mortality and significantly impaired flight capacity. Taken altogether, the results highlight the importance of testing the impact of multiple agrochemicals (i.e. not just insecticides) through different routes of exposure in order to understand more comprehensively the potential risks for Apis and non-Apis bees. MenosThe impact of agrochemicals on native Brazilian bees may be underestimated, since studies of non-target effects on bees have, by and large, concerned mostly the Apis mellifera L. Furthermore, bees may be exposed in the field to multiple agrochemicals through different routes, thus suggesting the necessity for more comprehensive toxicological experiments. Here, we assessed the lethal and sublethal toxicity of multiple agrochemicals (herbicide [glyphosate ? Roundup®], fungicide [mancozeb], insecticide [thiamethoxam]) through distinct routes of exposure (contact or ingestion) to an endangered native Brazilian bee Melipona (Michmelia) capixaba Moure & Camargo, 1994 and to A. mellifera. Results indicate that none of the agrochemicals caused feeding repellency on the bees. Thiamethoxam caused high mortality of both species, regardless of the route of exposure or the dose used. In addition, thiametoxam altered the flight capacity of M. capixaba when exposed to the lowest dose via contact exposure. The field dose of glyphosate caused high mortality of both bee species after oral exposure as well as impaired the flight capacity of A. mellifera (ingestion exposure) and M. capixaba (contact exposure). The lower dose of glyphosate also impaired the flight of M. capixaba through either routes of exposure. Exposure of A. mellifera through contact and ingestion to both doses of mancozeb caused high mortality and significantly impaired flight capacity. Taken altogether, the results highlig... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Glifosato. |
|
Thesagro: |
Abelha; Agrotóxico; Espécie em Extinção. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10646-023-02699-8
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02366nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1025073
005 2023-09-25
008 2023 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s10646-023-02699-8$2DOI
100 1 $aGOMES, I. N.
245 $aThe survival and flight capacity of commercial honeybees and endangered stingless bees are impaired by common agrochemicals.
260 $aEcotoxicology$c2023
520 $aThe impact of agrochemicals on native Brazilian bees may be underestimated, since studies of non-target effects on bees have, by and large, concerned mostly the Apis mellifera L. Furthermore, bees may be exposed in the field to multiple agrochemicals through different routes, thus suggesting the necessity for more comprehensive toxicological experiments. Here, we assessed the lethal and sublethal toxicity of multiple agrochemicals (herbicide [glyphosate ? Roundup®], fungicide [mancozeb], insecticide [thiamethoxam]) through distinct routes of exposure (contact or ingestion) to an endangered native Brazilian bee Melipona (Michmelia) capixaba Moure & Camargo, 1994 and to A. mellifera. Results indicate that none of the agrochemicals caused feeding repellency on the bees. Thiamethoxam caused high mortality of both species, regardless of the route of exposure or the dose used. In addition, thiametoxam altered the flight capacity of M. capixaba when exposed to the lowest dose via contact exposure. The field dose of glyphosate caused high mortality of both bee species after oral exposure as well as impaired the flight capacity of A. mellifera (ingestion exposure) and M. capixaba (contact exposure). The lower dose of glyphosate also impaired the flight of M. capixaba through either routes of exposure. Exposure of A. mellifera through contact and ingestion to both doses of mancozeb caused high mortality and significantly impaired flight capacity. Taken altogether, the results highlight the importance of testing the impact of multiple agrochemicals (i.e. not just insecticides) through different routes of exposure in order to understand more comprehensively the potential risks for Apis and non-Apis bees.
650 $aAbelha
650 $aAgrotóxico
650 $aEspécie em Extinção
653 $aGlifosato
700 1 $aGONTIJO, L. M.
700 1 $aLIMA, M. A. P.
700 1 $aZANÚNCIO JUNIOR, J. S.
700 1 $aRESENDE, H. C.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Biblioteca Rui Tendinha (BRT) |
|
|
Nenhum exemplar cadastrado para este documento. |
Fechar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
| 6. |  | COSTA, A. N. da.; MOLINO, J. A.; FERRÃO, L. M. V.; VENTURA, J. A.; RODRIGUES, C. J. S.; RODRIGUES, C. J. S.; GUARÇONI, A. M.; CAETANO, L. C. S.; FERRÃO, R. G.; COSTA, A. de F. S. da.; LIMA, I. de M.; PACHECO, B. M.; GOMES, S. A.; SILVA, A. M. da. Política editorial do Incaper. Vitória, ES : Incaper, 2012. 28 p. (Incaper. Documentos, 205). Documento institucional.| Biblioteca(s): Biblioteca Rui Tendinha. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
